Today's hottest deals

Asrockrack EPC621D8A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrockrack EPC621D8A  (all builds)
Memory114.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190403
Uptime8 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6252
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 706
62% 530 Pts
64-Core 2,708
168% 2,708 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Gigabyte(1458 232D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 136
Parallax 285
116% 188 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 145
Splatting 173
147% 182 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 122%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA960TDF 960GB
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 95420100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 695 695 692 692 692 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
151% Outstanding
Read 672
Write 674
Mixed 507
SusWrite 694
144% 637 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 47.1
168% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 713
527% 688 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 151%
Great: 151%
Crucial MTFDHBA960TDF 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 95420100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 697 694 696 692 692 693 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
152% Outstanding
Read 678
Write 685
Mixed 515
SusWrite 694
145% 643 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 47.2
169% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 623
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 690
518% 685 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 152%
Great: 151%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
877GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 94 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 85.4
Write 87.4
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 92.6
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
380GB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 94 93 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 94.1
Mixed 104
SusWrite 92.5
72% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.7 3.2 3.5 3.3 3.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Read 34.5
Write 10.4
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 3.2
16% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7JJR4N-VK 3x31.7GB
3 of 7 slots used
95GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 29.1
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 10.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPC621D8A Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrockrack EPC621D8A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback