Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 735 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170118
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 13:51
Run Duration695 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y31
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Memory 14.5
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 109
30% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 108
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 512MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 12.1.41532.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 3.87
2% 4.2 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 5.22
3% 3.54 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Windows 7-0 SSD 137GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.ZP6S84 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 28% Great: 49%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
59GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 1.1
Mixed 1.48
4% 4.94 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.14
20% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 0.4
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 364
11% 364 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback