Fujitsu CELSIUS R940power

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 126% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R940power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3358-A1
Memory	245.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151208
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '21 at 13:33
Run Duration	306 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 324 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 203 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 664 60% 505 Pts	64-Core 1,947 120% 1,947 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% PNY(196E 12FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 204 Reflection 304 Parallax 221 166% 243 fps	MRender 249 Gravity 214 Splatting 161 165% 208 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,406 Write 1,074 Mixed 792 241% 1,091 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 88.2 4K Mixed 44.6 155% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 427 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 405 297% 391 MB/s
Poor: 114% Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 215GB free Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1492 1493 1494 1492 1490 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,395 Write 1,411 Mixed 1,005 SusWrite 1492 299% 1,326 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 49.7 174% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 441 DQ Write 380 DQ Mixed 340 274% 387 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 291GB free Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1502 1505 1506 1506 1505 1504 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,377 Write 1,452 Mixed 827 SusWrite 1,505 291% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 45.9 161% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 450 DQ Write 393 DQ Mixed 426 318% 423 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 386GB free Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1474 1476 1479 1480 1481 1479 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,433 Write 1,384 Mixed 969 SusWrite 1478 296% 1,316 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 49 173% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 486 DQ Write 394 DQ Mixed 459 338% 446 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 241%
Seagate ST6000NM0024-1HT17Z 6TB 821 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 1TB free Firmware: SNC2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 204 205 207 206 207 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 192 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 206 128% 175 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1.3 279% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 8x31.9GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 8 of 16 slots used 255GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.4% Good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 24.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 17.2 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R940power Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940power

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2643 v3IntelBench 78%, 279 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	1x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	1x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	1x

SSD
SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 3,659 samples	1x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $690Bench 271%, 3,492 samples	1x
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	1x

RAM
HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 2x31.5GBHynixBench 58%, 155 samples	1x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	1x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16