QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	19.1GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 19.1GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	16.6 GB free of 19.0742 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 22:47
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 62.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 109 58% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 110 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 98.4 6% 98.4 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3715) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 196 Parallax 220 119% 187 fps	MRender 258 Gravity 222 Splatting 172 173% 217 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 89 83 84 107 112 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 234 Write 126 Mixed 175 SusWrite 90.9 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 13.1 45% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 71.7 DQ Mixed 117 81% 102 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 256GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 311 321 335 801 764 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 19GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 3148 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 13.4 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16