HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory0.9 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 01:42
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 B24
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 46.3
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 57
26% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 57.3
8-Core 56.8
8% 57 Pts
64-Core 56.9
4% 56.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 108 112 54 105 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 118
Write 95.6
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 93.8
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 1TB
530GB free
Firmware: GKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 34 34 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 81.9
Write 34.1
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 33.5
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 9E CM3X1G1333C9 ID:04 43 RMR1810EF48E7W133 35GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback