QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	31.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.3GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	24.1 GB free of 31.3301 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 13:20
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	84%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12-Core 86 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Memory 7.79 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 84.4 21% 43.4 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 161 19% 146 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 49.7 Parallax 75.5 46% 60.6 fps	MRender 35.4 Gravity 61.4 Splatting 39.5 37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 373 Write 326 Mixed 364 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 4.3 14% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 77%
Red Hat VirtIO 805GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 516GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 230 244 217 211 215 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.1% Below average	Read 362 Write 238 Mixed 282 SusWrite 222 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 3.4 13% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 31GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 15698 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 12.2 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 425 9% 425 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 203%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16