Today's hottest deals

AMD AOPW-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 55% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAMD AOPW-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD AOPW-PLUS
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 02:47
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 55%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 6128 HE
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 42.2
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 32.1
21% 30 Pts
4-Core 64.2
8-Core 118
11% 90.8 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.7
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 6.9 15 30 23 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 9.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 16.1
12% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U2 Kingston 99U5402-137.A00LF 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AOPW-PLUS Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: AMD AOPW-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback