Eurocom Shark 7R2

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Eurocom Shark 7R2 (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM Shark 7R2
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '17 at 01:10
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 202 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 549 57% 460 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 3,080 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Clevo(1558 0152) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 31.3 30% 35 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 32.1 Splatting 25.8 23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 27%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 119GB free Firmware: AXM07H1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 24368 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 18432 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12388 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1438 (AA) Unknown 71 71 1436 (AB) Unknown 99 99 6 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 63 (AE) Unknown 99 99 28 (B7) Unknown 100 100 17866 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 99 99 49 (BE) vendor-specific 78 78 22 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 9 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 201 201 0	46.2% Average	Read 251 Write 229 Mixed 218 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 9.27 62% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 11.9 30% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 51%
Intel SSDSCKKW120H6 120GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSBG100 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 201 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 850 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 81 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 76 103084195900 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 81 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 97579 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 95 95 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 97579 (F2) Unknown 100 100 85459 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1738 (FC) Unknown 100 100 24	78.7% Very good	Read 510 Write 244 Mixed 222 71% 325 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 39.9 116% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 64.2 DQ Mixed 82 77% 124 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 169GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 222 222 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3382 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3795 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1187 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 28 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 169627 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 279173595170 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 19 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 398 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	47.7% Average	Read 87.5 Write 79 Mixed 86.4 64% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.18 56% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C11S3L/8G 1315 CT102464BF186D.M16 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1867, 1867 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 20.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 21.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Eurocom Shark 7R2

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)