Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20ERCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20ERCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ERCTO1WW
Memory33.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 16:52
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 130
52% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 394
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M600M
Legend(17AA 222F) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 9.1
7% 8.13 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 11.2
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST500LM021-1KJ152 1TB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 306 178 169 180 172 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 406
Write 325
Mixed 357
SusWrite 226
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 37.1
118% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 232
180% 246 MB/s
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
52GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 41.2
Write 38.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 13.2
34% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 3 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.5
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ERCTO1WW Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 20ERCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback