Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 65.6
29% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 123
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Device(196D 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S350
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 190 173 173 186 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 223
Write 176
Mixed 185
SusWrite 183
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 17.9
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 27.3
32% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
113GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 86 89 87 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 73.1
Write 69.4
Mixed 51
SusWrite 87.8
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
219GB free
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 97 103 99 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.5
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 99.4
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S UCC Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback