Dell Latitude E7250

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell Latitude E7250 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0TVD2T
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20200410
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '21 at 00:33
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5600U 20,423 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 245 34% 251 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 062D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 6.9 4% 5.13 fps	MRender 7.3 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 7.8 6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X300 MSATA 256GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: X354 SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 254 236 195 208 248 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 386 Write 336 Mixed 267 SusWrite 239 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 28.6 109% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 206 182% 275 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 90%
SD 128GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 114GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 77.4 Write 37.1 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 35.1 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.6 548% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100V 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 337GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 15 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 23.3 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 15.6 30% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 37%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 64GB 729 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 18GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 6.4 5.9 6.3 6.4 5.7 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 28 Write 8 Mixed 10 SusWrite 6.3 14% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.1 147% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 19%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 23 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 15.4 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 13.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Latitude E7250 Builds (Compare 1,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7250

CPU
Core i5-5300UIntelBench 42%, 29,898 samples	624x
Core i7-5600UIntelBench 50%, 20,423 samples	438x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	24x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,089x
Iris Pro Graphics 5200IntelBench 4%, 1 sample	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
PM871 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 76%, 2,585 samples	184x
hynix SC210 mSATA 256GBSKBench 68%, 1,541 samples	91x
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	87x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	149x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	53x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16