Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.2 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	16.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '21 at 12:39
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9820X 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 41.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 243 69% 135 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 442 61% 452 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 134GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 125 99 41 23 60 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 345 Write 319 Mixed 351 SusWrite 85.2 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 9 31% 9.33 MB/s	DQ Read 9.5 DQ Write 9.3 DQ Mixed 9.4 7% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 53%
Qemu HARDDISK 166GB 68GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 208 120 51 51 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x15GB 645 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1 of 1 slots used 15GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 49.5 MC Mixed 25.5 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 8.3 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 151%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499