Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 15:25
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$312
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
87% 151 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 705
75% 586 Pts
64-Core 961
64% 961 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,376
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3756 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
169% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 194
Parallax 219
170% 207 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 204
Splatting 146
168% 196 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 169%
Great: 202%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 435 487 487 460 491 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 838
Write 530
Mixed 417
SusWrite 476
126% 565 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 53.5
172% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 453
356% 493 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 139%
Great: 339%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
0GB free
Firmware: 11130101
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,868
Write 1,988
Mixed 1,607
407% 1821 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 60.3
208% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1183
DQ Write 1,013
DQ Mixed 1,087
818% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 265%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
195GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 429 432 438 470 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 467
Mixed 432
SusWrite 440
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 50.2
160% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
GOODRAM 240GB
213GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 420 425 425 355 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 429
Mixed 306
SusWrite 409
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 30
125% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 170
160% 248 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 104%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$52
662GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 169 166 158 165 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 110
Write 148
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 163
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 20.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $711
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback