Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory0.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110614
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 09:24
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 41%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Memory 19
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 78.7
24% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 30.6
8-Core 36.9
4% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 34.6
2% 34.6 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3981) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 158 126 283 318 276 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 282
Write 252
Mixed 224
SusWrite 239
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 15.5
43% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 158
94% 101 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 43%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
115GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 40 57 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 52.6
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
55GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 5.9 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 14.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 10.4
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
116% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 39%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
43GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 16 20 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 23.9
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 19.4
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 328
12% 328 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback