Intel powered classmate PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel powered classmate PC  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 03:04
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 24
2-Core 41.6
30% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 47.1
8-Core 40.8
6% 43.9 Pts
64-Core 43
3% 43 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 55 63 71 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 10.5
Write 45
Mixed 26
SusWrite 60.6
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BF160B.D8FE 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 4
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 0.6
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical powered classmate PC Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel powered classmate PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback