To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 01:54
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2470 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 156
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 560
52% 437 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 49.9
49% 55.9 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 46.4
39% 47.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11L 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 950 118 80 78 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,331
Write 982
Mixed 804
SusWrite 324
191% 860 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 33.9
121% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 449
313% 388 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 126%
Great: 232%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
207GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 402 432 427 388 364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 440
Mixed 404
SusWrite 380
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 36.3
123% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 283
234% 335 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
102GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 402 429 424 425 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 436
Mixed 420
SusWrite 395
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 37.9
126% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 217
203% 314 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 145 141 144 143 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 95
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 139
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback