Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-772G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 14:00
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 152
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 394
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Acer(1025 0781) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 17
14% 16.4 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 13.3
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
37GB free
Firmware: EXT4400Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 124 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 490
Write 127
Mixed 150
SusWrite 122
48% 222 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 24.9
121% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 65.1
95% 184 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 17 12 8.6 36 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 0.7
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 25.8
6% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
919GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 112 112 110 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 112
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF CT102464BF160B.M16 CT102464BF160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 19.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772G Builds (Compare 575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback