ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4105E6G

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 4105E6G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo
Memory	20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '21 at 13:03
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 148 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 449 45% 366 Pts	64-Core 526 32% 526 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% EVGA(3842 2791) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44% Average	Lighting 50.3 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 71.3 41% 62.6 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 57.4 50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 480GB-$256 1,827 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 174 155 170 162 172 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.2% Average	Read 213 Write 213 Mixed 215 SusWrite 168 46% 202 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 15.2 52% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 90.1 DQ Mixed 120 90% 122 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 888GB free Firmware: AX101U SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 99 99 94 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 85.3 Write 85.6 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 96.5 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 241GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 74 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 73.9 Write 74.8 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 74.2 51% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 67%
Seagate BUP RD 5TB 1,206 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 538GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 22 23 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 21.1 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 22.6 17% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback