Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion VN325AA-ABE s5212es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion VN325AA-ABE s5212es  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON EVANS
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100126
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '17 at 12:04
Run Duration528 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 74.9
41% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 73
8-Core 74.8
10% 73.9 Pts
64-Core 74
5% 74 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9057) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.36 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP22 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 75.9
Write 80
Mixed 73.7
58% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 58%
PNY Transformer 32GB
28GB free, PID 6003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.65
9% 8.67 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.002
19% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 2.68
Mixed 4.92
10% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.37
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.006
17% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VN325AA-ABE s5212es Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion VN325AA-ABE s5212es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback