Lenovo 30DF-ISV0US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30DF-ISV0US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3172
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 13:47
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 309
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 1,010
91% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,816
112% 1,816 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3172) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.7
5% 8.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1124 2048 2252 2310 2290 1667 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,243
Write 2,288
Mixed 1,365
SusWrite 1,948
441% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 75.7
250% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 648
DQ Mixed 898
653% 858 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 324%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 25.6
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 26.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback