Dell PowerEdge R710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemDell PowerEdge R710
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R710  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 03:47
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5677
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 188
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 528
56% 446 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 80%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 585GB
493GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 397 403 394 394 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 555
Write 270
Mixed 484
SusWrite 393
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 47.2
182% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 138
105% 140 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 00AD000080AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 00CE000080CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 00AD000080AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 00AD000080AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 00CE000080CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 00AD000080AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 00AD000080AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9... 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R710 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback