Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation 690 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '21 at 16:21
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz 131 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Microprocessor, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 30.3 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 44.7 20% 32.8 Pts	4-Core 86.4 8-Core 135 14% 110 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 37 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 38.2 30% 38.5 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 40 Splatting 27.9 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4004RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 757 Write 14.5 Mixed 22.7 55% 265 MB/s	4K Read 94.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2 146% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.3 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 253 16% 253 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 148%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16