Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-865
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 00:48
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 650
73% 573 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 8424) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 21.1
13% 21.5 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 25.3
19% 22.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1343 991 994 997 999 998 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,993
Write 2,193
Mixed 1905
SusWrite 1,054
402% 1786 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65.2
220% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,405
DQ Write 1,021
DQ Mixed 1,196
898% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 266%
Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 193 193 196 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 191
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 195
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
USB Flash Memory 4GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 10.4
11% 8.73 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 066D TD48G26S819-VC 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 24.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 26.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback