Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 275E4E/275E5E (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP275E4V-K02ID
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140120
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za) 2,382 User benchmarks, average bench 24% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 48.3 1-Core 17.7 2-Core 27.8 23% 31.3 Pts	4-Core 29.3 8-Core 33.2 4% 31.2 Pts	64-Core 34.4 2% 34.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C680) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS 250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 212 214 223 169 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 350 Write 307 Mixed 243 SusWrite 208 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 13.8 46% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 95.6 DQ Mixed 94.7 74% 102 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5773EB0-CK0 4GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 275E4E/275E5E Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

CPU
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	25x
E2-2000 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 27%, 927 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	25x
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples	14x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
KP330 120GBKingbankBench 63%, 173 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	4x
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16