Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 186 63% 114 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 335 38% 297 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA17.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 72 110 79 65 116 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.4% Below average	Read 212 Write 117 Mixed 136 SusWrite 89.6 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 14 49% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 33.3 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 36.8 32% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 90%
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$65 3,754 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 430GB free Firmware: 01.01V03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 117 118 118 119 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 101 Write 92.2 Mixed 69.4 SusWrite 117 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 12GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.6 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	310x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	291x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	133x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $156

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16