Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-62 379 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 19.7 2-Core 16.4 30% 35.8 Pts	4-Core 20.3 8-Core 30.5 3% 25.4 Pts	64-Core 34.2 2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9100M G 317 User benchmarks, average bench 0% MSI(1462 6720) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.6 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 0.5 7% 9.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 52 68 68 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 118 Write 88.5 Mixed 100 SusWrite 70.1 21% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 9.7 36% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 37.4 32% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.43% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.43 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM