PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120326 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 08 '21 at 05:59 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 334 331 334 343 335 MB/s
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
392GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 54 85 12 MB/s
|
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Basic 2TB
1TB free, PID aa14
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 18 16 17 MB/s
|
5.04%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 MB/s
|
8.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
|
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 128x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 77x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 50x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 59x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 35x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $216 |