Mousecomputer/81 H97M-S01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMousecomputer/81 H97M-S01  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer H97M-S01
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '17 at 03:40
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 596
65% 512 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
MSI(1462 7924) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 500
Write 353
Mixed 384
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 39.6
109% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 170
159% 249 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
122GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 135
Mixed 133
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.27
100% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 109%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 37.5
Write 3.84
Mixed 5.61
13% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.21
4K Mixed 0.13
13% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2L16BC4R1-B0PS 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback