Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-7253

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardMSI MS-7253  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 22:21
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 25
30% 38.9 Pts
4-Core 55.8
8-Core 60.6
8% 58.2 Pts
64-Core 59.8
4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 60 105 41 73 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 122
Write 92.1
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 75.9
22% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 19.5
66% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 24.1
21% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
76GB free
Firmware: PF2OA21B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 54 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 54.3
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 53
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 0.3
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7253 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7253

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback