Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80T7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80T7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 00RD15IPG076
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 17:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Memory 21.3
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 17.8
11% 15.7 Pts
4-Core 31.1
8-Core 34.2
4% 32.7 Pts
64-Core 9.5
1% 9.5 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.2
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSK 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 96 100 99 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 122
Write 75.1
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 94.8
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 6.1
1,054% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
376GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 97 89 99 92 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 100
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 89.3
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674EB0-YK0 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 3.3
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 0.7
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 311
13% 311 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80T7 Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80T7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback