Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR) 13,243 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Memory 35.8 1-Core 35.7 2-Core 57.9 27% 43.1 Pts	4-Core 61.5 8-Core 72.1 9% 66.8 Pts	64-Core 86.8 5% 86.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 81F9) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.76% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 6.3 2% 5.17 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 5.5 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.76% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 248 249 184 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 300 Write 266 Mixed 254 SusWrite 157 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 12 48% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 35.9 56% 106 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G 12GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,495x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,738x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	378x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16