HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory372.8 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 14:12
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6238R
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 212
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 723
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 2,896
179% 2,896 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 195
Parallax 230
156% 206 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 200
Splatting 161
164% 207 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 147%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK960TDT-1AW1ZABHB 960GB
664GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 431 416 414 412 420 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.9% Excellent
Read 387
Write 405
Mixed 310
SusWrite 422
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 28.1
100% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 324
235% 301 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 85%
Crucial MTFDDAK960TDT-1AW1ZABHB 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 434 420 417 416 421 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.1% Excellent
Read 410
Write 409
Mixed 309
SusWrite 425
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 28.8
107% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 325
236% 303 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 85%
ST4000NM002A 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 232 232 233 233 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 233
Write 233
Mixed 184
SusWrite 232
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 1.4
64% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 1.7
4% 8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%
ST4000NM002A 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 228 230 224 221 229 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.8% Below average
Read 231
Write 225
Mixed 162
SusWrite 227
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 1.7
60% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 5.1
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 2.4
4% 8.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 44%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
27GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 2.4 4.9 6.9 5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 9.2
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 5.3
13% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CVF 12x31.9GB
12 of 24 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 76.3
MC Mixed 63.3
195% 68.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 160%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback