Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '21 at 14:38
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 125 53% 88.7 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 192 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 20.5 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 17 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 209 210 220 219 221 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.9% Good	Read 236 Write 224 Mixed 215 SusWrite 210 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 38.3 124% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.9 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 50.2 41% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 144 146 144 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 149 Write 149 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 143 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 83%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 500GB 338 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 407GB free Firmware: 0214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 29 30 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 23.9 Write 26.8 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 28.5 20% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 13.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	76x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	69x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	28x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	24x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	7x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	163x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	113x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16