bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 14:58
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 137
60% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 218
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 54
0% 33.1 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 33.1
33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC7110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 282 272 260 250 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 400
Write 290
Mixed 242
SusWrite 264
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 21
76% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 204
185% 283 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
283GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 60 51 39 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 50.9
20% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545025A7E330 250GB
199GB free
Firmware: GREOA340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 95 92 93 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 26
SusWrite 94
59% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
16GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 80
Write 83.7
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 39.4
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
16GB free
Firmware: GGBOAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 70 67 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 44
Write 42
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 69.9
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 44%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
110GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 27 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 26.7
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 CT102464BD160B.C16 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback