Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory13GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2215
Memory8.6 GB free of 13 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1824 x 1036 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 32.3
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 95.2
36% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 182
22% 172 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 1.8
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 2.5
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 103 62 61 51 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 403
Write 326
Mixed 178
SusWrite 90.9
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 5.3
41% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 90.8
DQ Mixed 12.9
34% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
773GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 103 106 104 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 104
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-002.A00LF Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 13GB
1066, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
1024, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.3% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 242
17% 242 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback