Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Xi3 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (all builds)
Motherboard	Xi3 401-0001-303
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3400+ 7 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket AM2R, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Memory 42.1 1-Core 25.5 2-Core 25 23% 30.9 Pts	4-Core 50 8-Core 43.4 6% 46.7 Pts	64-Core 44.4 3% 44.4 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 0102) 320MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.4 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS480G 480GB 658 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 427GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 115 125 93 121 117 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 151 Write 144 Mixed 160 SusWrite 116 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 18.4 52% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 64.3 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 75.1 56% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB Row of chips DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.49% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 3 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.5 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.49% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16