| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 74.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | Apple MacPro2,1 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Apple Mac-F4208DA9 |
| Memory | 29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20070702 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 14 '17 at 14:10 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5365
CPU-A ( 0 ), 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
40%
Below average
|
36% 53.8 Pts
|
15% 112 Pts
|
7% 120 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
74.4%
Very good
|
79% 94.7 fps
|
66% 80.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28.5%
Poor
|
35% 160 MB/s
|
46% 17.7 MB/s
|
16% 30.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
11% 4 GB/s
|
8% 2.83 GB/s
|
32% 125 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MacPro2,1 Builds (Compare 78 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Apple MacPro2,1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon X53651stBench 44%, 504 samples | 16x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples | 14x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 9x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 6x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $35 |