Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Compaq WU115EA-ACB 100eu RU100 (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN Priv
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100521
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D410 241 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 5.5 2-Core 10 25% 28.2 Pts	4-Core 11.3 8-Core 11.7 2% 11.5 Pts	64-Core 11.5 1% 11.5 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 35%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 60 60 65 66 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 73.1 Write 68.3 Mixed 44.9 SusWrite 59.3 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x2GB 403 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.62% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.1 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16