Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Memory 25.4 1-Core 18.6 2-Core 27.8 16% 23.9 Pts	4-Core 43.7 8-Core 65.8 7% 54.8 Pts	64-Core 51.5 3% 51.5 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3904) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 2.6 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 445GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 246 327 332 273 271 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 420 Write 418 Mixed 408 SusWrite 291 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 16 68% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 150 112% 148 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GB 2,027 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 283 14% 283 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	15x
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	13x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	11x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	53x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	13x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	6x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	6x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16