Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	16.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3667U 3,556 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 82.2 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 143 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 210 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.87 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08TH SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 187 208 186 132 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 360 Write 220 Mixed 231 SusWrite 173 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 12 60% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 23.9 41% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 6GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.8 5.6 4.8 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 110 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.3 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

CPU
Core i5-3437UIntelBench 49%, 3,817 samples	341x
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	319x
Core i7-3687UIntelBench 53%, 2,933 samples	174x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	966x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	66x
520 Series 180GBIntel $99Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	29x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	29x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $298	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350