QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
Memory 58
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 119
47% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 160
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 34GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.5 6.9 8.2 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 62%
Qemu HARDDISK 752GB
496GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Read 421
Write 308
Mixed 336
SusWrite 111
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 7.7
31% 8.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback