AMI Aptio CRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 09:42
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3845
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 18
2-Core 35.6
30% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 63.1
8-Core 66.2
8% 64.6 Pts
64-Core 62
4% 62 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3ME3 32GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S17411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 146
Write 37.2
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 40.9
16% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 4.3
32% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 21.4
DQ Mixed 17.4
14% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 23%
2.5" SATA SSD 3M 256GB
0GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.08% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 19.3
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 17.6
24% 18 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 1.47 MB/s
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 16.2
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 14.9
25% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.6
172% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aptio CRB Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMI Aptio CRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback