Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$59 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 73 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 45.7 38% 52 Pts	4-Core 55.4 8-Core 56.8 7% 56.1 Pts	64-Core 79.3 5% 79.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20 2,184 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.ACB SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.36% Terrible	Read 12 Write 13 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 13.6 9% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.1 Write 20.3 Mixed 22.6 29% 24 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.1 209% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7200Intel $14Bench 38%, 6,054 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
ABS120G 120GBBench 50%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	1x
7GBUnknownBench 24%, 8,824 samples	1x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $14