Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 05:29
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 140
2-Core 283
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,048
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,092
130% 2,092 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$472
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 184
Parallax 176
163% 187 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 139
Splatting 126
118% 148 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 138%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2955 3143 3066 3411 3413 1013 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 1,735
Write 3,334
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 2,834
558% 2,450 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 56.2
198% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,164
877% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 356%
Great: 502%
Amd-raid Array 1 16TB
14.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 358 228 246 301 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 321
Write 210
Mixed 146
SusWrite 273
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.4
18% 6.03 MB/s
DQ Read 7.2
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 3.7
4% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 27
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 24.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $937
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback