Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NW73C
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 11:38
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$192
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 153
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 370
40% 317 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Sapphire(174B 1366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 60.9
Parallax 54.2
41% 55 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 48.8
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 60 56 50 50 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 234
Write 85.5
Mixed 92
SusWrite 55.3
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 19.2
83% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 55.3
64% 114 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
76GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 98 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 87
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 97.4
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
36GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 42
SusWrite 52
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB-$30
79GB free
Firmware: BBFOC32P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 44
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 52.8
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback