Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7502P 32-Core 50 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 46.9 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 198 61% 115 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 838 65% 577 Pts	64-Core 4,169 258% 4,169 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 77%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxd51rue960g TOSHIBA 960GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 817GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1CEE6111 SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 666 703 601 707 700 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,509 Write 550 Mixed 410 SusWrite 675 173% 786 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 32.9 104% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 726 DQ Write 762 DQ Mixed 448 419% 646 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 303%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40DB2-CVF 4x31.8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	MC Read 67.5 MC Write 53.3 MC Mixed 62.5 175% 61.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 31.9 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 128%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16