Today's hottest deals

Asus PRO A520M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRO A520M-C  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200724
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 16:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 238
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 774
79% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 51.1
32% 42.9 fps
MRender 53.6
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 38.6
38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1295 406 407 407 407 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,330
Write 2,215
Mixed 1,530
SusWrite 555
370% 1,657 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 80.5
258% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 932
673% 876 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 245%
Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-159.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 29.2
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO A520M-C Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRO A520M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback