bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory9.85GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9.85GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory8.4 GB free of 9.85156 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 18:11
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 520
63% 483 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405)
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 115
50% 89 fps
MRender 90.9
Gravity 96.6
Splatting 85.1
74% 90.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1681
Write 1,159
Mixed 1,391
313% 1,410 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 52.3
178% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 187
146% 203 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-256MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-32MB Virtual RAM VMW-8MB 9GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 1024, 512, 256, 64, 32, 8 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 36.5
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback