TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell PowerEdge T410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell PowerEdge T410
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T410  (all builds)
Memory51.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 11:31
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 165
56% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 540
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 72.3%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 114 129 134 155 157 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33% Below average
Read 180
Write 168
Mixed 164
SusWrite 143
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 15
49% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 35.5
28% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 33%
 Great: 124%
Dell PERC 6/i Adapter 1TB
241GB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 57 34 34 33 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 606
Write 221
Mixed 329
SusWrite 43
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 32.7
103% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 22.1
DQ Mixed 36.9
41% 74 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 63.4%
 Great: 98%
Dell PERC 6/i Adapter 2TB
703GB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 47 48 48 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
823GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 156 158 161 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 162
Mixed 66
SusWrite 156
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 96.9%
 Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965525-100.A00LF 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 37%
 Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PowerEdge T410 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T410

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples10x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56601stBench 66%, 2,343 samples6x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples5x
GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples2x
SSD
PERC 6/i Adapter 898GBDellBench 94%, 4 samples3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples2x
PERC 6/i Adapter 3TBDellBench 75%, 6 samples2x
RAM
HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 4x8GBHynixBench 61%, 135 samples3x
36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 8x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 22 samples3x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynixBench 86%, 188 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback