Today's hottest deals

IBM Node 1, Processor Card

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIBM Node 1, Processor Card  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 16:50
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 4870
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 99.3
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 88.1
53% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 351
31% 264 Pts
64-Core 1,298
80% 1,298 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 239GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 22 62 180 165 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 1,692
Mixed 1,574
SusWrite 110
272% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 59.4
220% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 232
177% 237 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 144%
Great: 167%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 216GB
176GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 234 234 228 229 229 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 1,507
Mixed 1,366
SusWrite 233
239% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 36.8
118% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 199
154% 209 MB/s
SMART 2GB
1GB free, PID f100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 10.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 11
16% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 39.3
102% 39.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback